All guides Compare

AgencyAnalytics vs Whatagraph vs Clearly

Three billing units: per client, per organisation, or flat. Two are agency platforms and one is not.

By Andrew McLeod · 5 min read

AgencyAnalytics bills per client. Whatagraph bills the organisation on an annual contract. Clearly bills a flat monthly fee for the account. Two are agency platforms and one is not, and most of this comparison follows from that.

The table compares what each bill is attached to, what each includes without an add-on, and where each stops.

At a glance

Checked against each vendor's pricing page in August 2026.

AgencyAnalytics Whatagraph Clearly
You pay for Each client The organisation The account
Entry price $20 per client a month, billed annually. From €699 a month billed annually, with 50 source credits. Free for one report. $49 a month unlimited.
Growing costs Scales with client count. Annual billing saves 20%. Source credits above the included 50. Prime is custom priced. Nothing is metered. Team is $149 a month.
Integrations 85+ Broad, premium sources on Prime Six
Users Unlimited staff and client users Unlimited users and reports One on Pro, unlimited on Team
White label Custom domain and email Custom branding, report domain on Prime Per-report theming, no custom domain
Scheduled delivery Yes Automated emails with PDF No, share link is always live
AI summaries AI Tracker add-on, $20.83 a month per 250 credits Whatagraph IQ on all plans Included, daily question limit by plan
Try before paying 14 day trial, no card, 30 day money-back guarantee. 14 day trial, no card. Free tier is permanent.

AgencyAnalytics and Whatagraph facts from agencyanalytics.com/pricing and whatagraph.com/pricing, August 2026. Clearly is our own product.

What each one charges for

A linear bill, a flat bill and a small flat bill behave very differently as you grow.

Figure 1. What your bill attaches to

Prices change; the billing model is the part that lasts.

AgencyAnalytics

Scales by

Clients

Five clients or thirty is five or thirty times the unit price. Cheap to start, and it tracks the roster in both directions.

Whatagraph

Scales by

Source credits

The fee does not move as clients arrive, so it rewards a large roster, but asks for an annual commitment before you have proven the fit.

Clearly

Scales by

Nothing

One account fee whatever you connect. The ceiling is what the six connectors cover, not the plan.

The two agency models cross over: a per-client line starts below a flat organisational fee and climbs, while the flat fee does not move. Work out where that happens with your real client count.

Where each one fits

Three different shapes of buyer.

AgencyAnalytics

A growing client roster, where a bill that tracks the roster is a feature. The 85+ integrations cover whatever platform the next client uses.

Whatagraph

An established team wanting a flat organisational fee, deep white-label, and on Prime an API, premium integrations and transfer to BigQuery.

Clearly

One business rather than a roster, where the question is what changed last month, not how to produce thirty branded reports.

Category SEO serves agency pricing pages to everybody, including the single in-house marketer and the consultant with three clients. For them the useful question is not which agency platform to pick, but whether they need agency machinery at all.

What Clearly does not do

Against two agency platforms, the gaps are specific.

Questions worth answering first

These four narrow it faster than three trials.

  1. 1 How many clients are you reporting on?

    One is a business, three a consultancy, twenty an agency, and the columns sort themselves.

  2. 2 Which platforms have to appear in the report?

    Anything outside GA4, Search Console, Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn and Sheets rules Clearly out in two minutes.

  3. 3 What commitment can you make today?

    An annual contract before the fit is proven is a different risk from a monthly one. Weigh it against the annual saving.

  4. 4 Does anyone on your side read the numbers already?

    If somebody does, the fastest report builder wins. If nobody does, that gap is what you are solving.

The short version

AgencyAnalytics prices for a growing roster and has the broadest integration library of the three. Whatagraph prices for an established team, with white-label depth and, on Prime, API and warehouse access. Both are mature platforms built around the client roster.

Clearly is a different shape: one business, one report, and an explanation of what moved. All three include AI summaries, so the difference is method. Clearly computes its candidate factors in code, and the model only ranks and narrates them, citing supplied numbers rather than generating any.

In Clearly: the free tier is a real report that does not expire, so you can judge whether it reads like something you would forward before deciding.

Common questions

Which one is cheapest?

It depends on client count, and the two agency tools cross over. AgencyAnalytics is a straight line at $20 per client a month billed annually, so five clients costs far less than a flat organisational fee and thirty clients does not. Whatagraph publishes Max from €699 a month billed annually, which does not move as clients arrive. Clearly is flat and low but is not an agency platform.

How does Clearly differ from AgencyAnalytics?

They are built around different units. AgencyAnalytics is organised around a client roster: 85 or more integrations, unlimited staff and client users, custom domain and email, and a bill that scales per client. Clearly is organised around a single business: six connectors, one flat fee, no client seats, and a report that names the likely drivers of a change. An agency needs the first shape. A single in-house marketer or a consultant with a few clients is buying a lot of roster machinery they will not use.

What is a source credit in Whatagraph pricing?

Whatagraph's Max plan starts from 50 source credits, where credits correspond to the data sources you connect rather than to users or reports, both of which are unlimited. The exact consumption rules affect your bill and can change, so confirm the current definition with Whatagraph rather than relying on a comparison page.

Do all three explain why numbers changed?

All three offer something here. Whatagraph includes Whatagraph IQ on all plans for summaries and chat. AgencyAnalytics sells an AI Tracker add-on at $20.83 a month per 250 credits billed annually. Clearly includes it, and computes around ten candidate factors deterministically in code before the model ranks and narrates the top two or three, citing only numbers it was handed, so it cannot invent a figure.

Are these prices current?

They were checked in August 2026 against each vendor's own pricing page, and both are linked above. Treat the billing model as the durable part and confirm the figures before you buy. If something here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.

Related guides

See the report on your own data.

Free for one report, permanently. No card, nothing expires.

Create a report →